psybelle: (shit.)
I spent a chunk of today kind of laughing at myself for last night's bit of edginess. I'm fully aware that I'm "doing this to myself"...

But really. It doesn't take much doing....


The White House took pains to emphasize the symbolism of John Brennan's swearing-in ceremony as Director of the CIA.

“There’s one piece of this that I wanted to note for you,” spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters gathered for their daily briefing. “Director Brennan was sworn in with his hand on an original draft of the Constitution that had George Washington’s personal handwriting and annotations on it, dating from 1787.”


That is, he swore on a copy of the Constitution that did not contain the Bill of Rights: no First Amendment, no Fourth Amendment...

Now, that's symbolism.
psybelle: (. . .)
The war against surveillance can never stop.


Yeah, no. This is appalling... way worse than warrantless GPS monitoring (which was declared unconstitutional). VPN and Tor, here I come...



At this point, I think I need to do a bit of research into Lamar Smith, other bills he may have sponsored...
Looking at the Stamp Act... There are some parallels, but I don't know how well this sort of thing is going to play out against ACTA (short form: SOPA/PIPA have a bigger, nastier counterpart - the battle against surveillance and censorship is just beginning).


And notsomuch: addendum to the anti-kyriarchy rant: apparently, Rand Paul was detained by the TSA for refusing screening as "too invasive." While on his way to an anti-choice rally. *spits*
psybelle: (. . .)
MPAA threatens politicians:

"Those who count on quote 'Hollywood' for support need to understand that this industry is watching very carefully who's going to stand up for them when their job is at stake. Don't ask me to write a check for you when you think your job is at risk and then don't pay any attention to me when my job is at stake..."


This is a "Dear Hollywood, it is not ok to not know how the internet works" moment. Hollywood can "buy" legislators, spend for influence. But money cannot hold back technology, and there will always be too many people willing to ignore stupid laws, and too many smart people willing to actively undermine unreasonable laws - the powers you thought you bought cannot find them all, much less arrest all of them.



Also, Does anybody doubt that we need campaign-financing reform? I love this, think I'm going to print it out and send it, along with a paper letter, to DiFi's office.
psybelle: (. . .)
This one's important - it's a review of sorts of the anti-SOPA/PIPA campaign (and a small slice of history). What worked, some of how/why it worked, what the surprises were, what might be good ideas for next time. Because there will be a next time...

http://dashes.com/anil/2012/01/the-history-and-future-of-web-protest.html
psybelle: (. . .)
... and found this: Black March. Many thanks to nighean_isis for the headsup!


I'm in, with small caveats... One suggestion was to buy content (if you must) only from independent retailers/creators who opposed SOPA/PIPA, but avoid Big Industry entertainments. My neighborhood indie bookstore will be the only place I'll shop for books and such, and I'll only be buying used media for the month... (Not that it would be a hardship for me to go completely without for the month. But I like supporting independent retailers, and this is one way of doing that.)


I know there are independent creators who actually support those bills in spite of the legislation being poorly written, badly aimed and utterly ineffective. The question I'd love to ask, if I was speaking to them, is: Which way do you lose more business? Through "piracy" or through people like me who are adamantly against censorship (and the presumption of guilt, and punishment without trial) and shop by our ethics?

heh.

Jan. 14th, 2012 03:45 pm
psybelle: (. . .)
As it says, "Periodically refreshed without commentary."

Not that commentary is really necessary...

Huh.

Dec. 23rd, 2011 12:55 pm
psybelle: (. . .)
GoDaddy changed its mind about supporting SOPA... Bad PR (or at least *more* of it) and the rush of folks ditching for companies opposed to the blacklist bill well in advance of the proposed 12/29 date to leave GoDaddy probably had a little bit to do with that.


There are still many companies that support the bill (Wednesday's list is here, hasn't been updated to reflect GoDaddy's shift), and some of them might be "too big to boycott" (as JP Barlow put it)... but none of them are too big to completely ignore public opinion.

Personally, I don't think Mastercard and Visa are too big to boycott, at least in part... I don't know about you all, but I own too much damn plastic and am in the process of slowly cutting back to one "emergency card" and maybe one "daily use" card (and, no, I don't use all the plastic I own - it's another reason I'm cutting back). I'll happily write a letter to both behemoths stating that I'm cutting back in part because of the irregularities in the banking industry over the last couple of years (several of my card-issuing banks have been implicated in unsavory dealings), but that their support of a bill that will actually make the internet less secure is hastening my process of weaning myself off the use of plastic entirely.

I may or may not send polite and slightly puzzled letters to the cosmetics companies on that list, asking why they're supporting bad internet legislation... But I'm not a heavy customer of any of them, don't feel that "threatening to leave forever" is particularly useful.
psybelle: (. . .)
If you are opposed to SOPA and are a client of GoDaddy, you could move your domains (as well as your money)...


It's worth reading the comments for the cautions about "moving" accounts to a GoDaddy sock-puppet company, if you decide to do this.
psybelle: (shit.)
While we still don't know what sort of coordination there was between the various mayors on that infamous conference call (or what sort of support they had), there is now strong evidence for coordination between police chiefs and possible links to DHS.


Some good stuff on pepper spray and excessive force... Including kickbacks:

"If you see references to the FBI’s endorsement of pepper spray, look closely to see if the author also notes that FBI agent Thomas Ward, the person responsible for the research, 'pleaded guilty to accepting a $57,500 kickback from a pepper spray company.' That was 1996; he was sentenced to two months in prison and he was fired from the FBI."


And the Ninth Circuit Court's opinion on what constitutes excessive force:
"In Headwaters II ((August 26, 2011), the Ninth Circuit held that police officers employ excessive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment when they use pepper spray upon an individual who is engaged in the commission of a non-violent misdemeanor and who is disobeying a police officer’s order but otherwise poses no threat to the officer or others."



Looks like the lobbying firms are worried... The video clip is interesting, the memo is interesting. And, yes, this is one memo, from one firm, a year in advance of the elections. Expect lots of lies, lots of ugly; anybody want to start a betting pool as to when martial law is declared?
psybelle: (shit.)
One last nightmarish tidbit before I call it quits for the night:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/07/koch-brothers-database-2012-election

This is the post-Citizens United world. I don't remember the exact statistic (saw it a week or so ago) but something like 90% of elected officials were the candidates who spent the most money. We do not live in a democracy anymore, and I hesitate to call it a plutocracy; kleptocracy sounds bitter and jaded and hopeless....


I would love to point Anonymous at Themis, see what happens: for some reason, that seems more hopeful than pitting the 99% against the Koch Brothers. And, given the combination of what all the Republican Party has been willing to throw under the bus to stymie any progress Obama's been willing to initiate and the lack of *reasonable* candidates for the Koch Brothers to choose from, I want a Plan B of some sort. At this point, I don't think that they have the best interests of the country at heart/in mind, wouldn't put it past them to put a dead dog in the Oval Office if it meant defeating Obama; and the rest of us can (continue to) rot.

*sigh*

Oct. 2nd, 2011 04:26 pm
psybelle: (. . .)
San Francisco still had paper ballots to mark in the last election...

But the article in Salon makes me think that absentee ballots might be the way to go, elsewhere...
AKA ask and you shall receive...


Friends,

I spent the last week making art and working with the community groups-- including many folks facing bank foreclosure on their homes--leading this mass mobilization against Wall St and the Big Banks. I'd say, this is an overdue key historic moment for anyone who can to throw down--take the afternoon off and maybe even go to jail. Please jojn me, hundreds of others and seriously hit up your folks to join you. It's part of a wave of community and labor led mass mobilizations in nine cities in conjunction with Occupy Wall St in New York City.

hope, David Solnit

*** PLEASE POST, CIRCULATE & SHARE WITH OTHERS ***

Occupy Wall St West!

Make Banks Pay!

Big Banks helped to crash our economy, destroy our communities and wreck our budgets.

Now they are back to record profits & bonuses while we are forced to pay for the mess they helped to create!

Thurs., Sept. 29, 3pm

555 California at Pine/B of A Plaza

(Mongomery BART), Downtown SF

Join us, as community groups, students, workers, faith leaders and others come together to stop playing defense and start going on the offense to say:

It's time for Big Banks and Large Corporations to Pay Up!

Facebook event - http://facebook.com/event.php?eid=208886969173724

__________
psybelle: (. . .)
I suspect that if I grew up in NYC with a name like "Tony Baloney", I might not have much of a sense of humor either... but I don't think I'd go so far as to mace nonviolent/penned female protesters. (The Atlantic has a really gruesome slow-motion annotated version of the video that I can't recommend simply because it's so so horrifying. The implications are ugly enough on their own.)

And it doesn't help that Southwest Airlines seems to think that same-sex affection is not ok (they get to police passengers' size/weight, wardrobe, and kissing partners? guess who I'm not flying!)...


I'm not sure what all else I'm pissed off about this evening... but this might well be enough. (to last me for the next two weeks.)

damn.

Sep. 24th, 2011 12:20 pm
psybelle: (. . .)
NYPD shot first... and made it ugly.
Teargas, tasers, kettling for peaceful protests.

#occupywallstreet
psybelle: (shit.)
I don't know where to begin to talk about this.
(Fixing the evils of DRM won't even start to address the issues...)

http://seanan-mcguire.livejournal.com/390067.html
psybelle: (shit.)
It's The Smartest Guys in the Room all over again, with oil rather than California's electricity: Rolling Stone has a short piece on oil speculation.


I am utterly disgusted.

Profile

psybelle

August 2024

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags